Table of Contents

Paid Offerings

Competitive evaluations typically come down to V7 vs COMPETITOR_1 and COMPETITOR_2, and against both we own a win rate greater than 80%.

We pride ourselves on knowing our prospects better than competitor sales teams, of providing a better buying experience, and ultimately in delivering a better product experience. Further details can be found below on COMPETITOR_1 and COMPETITOR_2, as well as other competitors in our space.

Generally, softer competitive positioning highlights the following points:

1. We were built by ML Engineers, for ML Engineers, when our founders discovered their previous biggest issues in developing great ML as founders and consultants was training data orchestration. This means we’re more likely to understand our customers problems intently and build a great solution for them
2. We’re the quality-first solution - other tools will try and drive volume primarily, our view is to drive great model performance first, rather than drive massive volumes
3. Delightful UI - easy to onboard teams, get them ramped, and add new members into it.
4. Flexibility in everything you do for the CV team; easy to integrate open API, flexible formats, everything designed to allow for scalable and beautiful pipeline

V7 vs competitors

Analysis of V7 vs Competitor_1

Analysis of V7 vs Competitor_2

Analysis of V7 vs Competitor_3

Analysis of V7 vs Competitor_4

Analysis of V7 vs Competitor_5

Analysis of V7 vs Competitor_6

Analysis of V7 vs Competitor_7

Open Source and “DIY” Tools

The most common Status Quo for our prospects is open source tools, upon which they have built a customised solution. The best of these open source tools is XXX, but others include LabelIMG, VGG, and ITK Snap and 3D Slicer from the medical world.